![]() ![]() So while the 13″ models minor update has raised a few curious eyebrows, the specs of the new MacBook Pro 15″ and 17″ model are undoubtedly very powerful and quite enticing.Īnyone have an extra $2300 laying around? That MacBook Pro 15″ with a Core i7 chip and high-res screen is looking like a Mac lovers dream. If the above benchmarks are any indicator of general speed increases when moving from a Core 2 Duo to the new Intel Core i5/i7 chips, I’m not so sure I agree with that statement, but I imagine some real world benchmarks on the 13″ will soon appear and we’ll have an answer. Apple MacBook Pro 13. Damaged - Apple MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2017, Two Thunderbolt 3 ports). ![]() Users will see far more performance boost from the speedy graphics.” : Apple MPDL2LL/A 13 MacBook Pro, Retina, Touch Bar, 3.3GHz Intel i7 Dual Core, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, macOS Mojave 10.14, Space Gray (Renewed). Macbook pro 13 inch 2017 i5 8 gb 128gb Hard Drive. The long-awaited new flagship 13 and 15 MacBook Pros bring performance boosts. ![]() “We chose killer graphics plus 10 hour battery life over a very small CPU speed increase. 3 GHz Intel Core i5 processor (7360U), with dual independent processor. ![]() Apparently I’m not the only one who wonders about the use of an older CPU in the 13″ model, according to MacRumors, someone emailed Steve Jobs asking about it and received this response: TechCrunch speculates that Apple chose to forgo haw computing power in favor of the extended battery life, but that seems like an odd compromise for a Pro machine. After seeing these huge increases in performance, I’m a little confused as to why Apple didn’t put a Core i5 into my personal favorite MacBook Pro, the 13″ model. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |